Design and implementation of intensive care unit protocols for critical care nurses in River Nile State Government Hospitals -Sudan

Design and implementation of intensive care unit protocols for critical care nurses in River Nile State Government Hospitals -Sudan

 

Mahadi Abdelrahman Fadulelseid 1*2 Dr Higazi Mohammed Ahmed Abdallah

 

1st Khartoum University, medical- surgical nursing Sudan, MSC of medical surgical nursing (PhD candidate karary university)  mahadyabdo8@gmail.com .

2 Associate professor of medical - surgical nursing, -Fezzan university.Libya.higazi124@yahoo.com

 

*Corresponding Author: Mahadi Abdelrahman Fadulelseid

Khartoum University, medical- surgical nursing Sudan, MSC of medical surgical nursing (PhD candidate karary university) , mahadyabdo8@gmail.com

 

Abstract

Background:

The utilization of protocols in the Intensive care unit can potentially improve the care of the critically ill patient. Because of the complexities of caring for the critically ill patient, the use of protocols in the intensive care unit has become increasingly common. We will review the definition of a protocol, discuss their advantages, and highlight some of the limitations and potential for harm with their use

Objectives: This study IMES To design and implement of intensive care unit protocol for critical care nurses in River Nile State Government Hospitals

Method QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL STUDY Total coverage sampling method was adopted to select70 nurses working in icu governmental hospitals - in River Nile State Self-administered structured questionnaire and check list was used for data collection and analysed using IBM SPSS Version 20. Descriptive and inferential statistics such as frequency, percentage, mean, Chi-square test was used to analyse the data.

 Result:

Comparative Analysis – Pre‑Study vs. Post‑Study Results

The comparison between the pre‑study (before “ICU” training) and post‑study (after “ICU” training) analyses reveal clear improvements in both confidence and practice among participants.

1. Infection Control Practices

• Pre‑study: Responses showed variability, with some nurses focusing only on single measures such as hand hygiene or PPE. Smaller proportion consistently applied the full package of infection control practices.

• Post‑study: The majority (62.9%) reported consistently following all measures together — hand hygiene, PPE use, equipment disinfection, and isolation protocols.

• Difference: Training reinforced the idea that infection control is a system of interconnected safeguards, leading to a shift from fragmented habits to comprehensive application.

2. Confidence in Infection Control Measures

• Pre‑study: Confidence levels were mixed, with some participants reporting only slight or moderate confidence.

• Post‑study: More than 90% described themselves as confident or very confident in applying infection control measures.

• Difference: The study clearly boosted self‑assurance, showing that structured learning translates into stronger readiness and reliability in practice.

3. Familiarity with Documentation Protocols

• Pre‑study: A notable portion of nurses were only somewhat familiar with documentation standards.

• Post‑study: Nearly 70% reported being very familiar, reflecting improved clarity and consistency in record‑keeping and incident reporting.

• Difference: Training helped close gaps in documentation knowledge, reducing risks of inconsistency.

4. Daily Nursing Roles and Effectiveness

• Pre‑study: Some nurses expressed neutral or negative views about the effectiveness of daily responsibilities.

• Post‑study: More than 90% rated responsibilities as effective or very effective.

• Difference: The study appears to have aligned tasks more closely with patient needs, improving perceptions of role effectiveness.

5. Familiarity and a Confidence with “ICU” Equipment

• Pre‑study: Familiarity and troubleshooting confidence varied, with some nurses reporting limited experience.

• Post‑study: Around 80% described themselves as very or extremely familiar with equipment, and more than 80% felt very or extremely confident in troubleshooting.

• Difference: Training provided hands‑on exposure, transforming uncertainty into technical resilience.

6. Equipment Maintenance and Impact on Patient Care

• Pre‑study: Perceptions of maintenance effectiveness and equipment impact were moderate, with some nurses unsure of its role.

• Post‑study: Nearly three‑quarters rated maintenance as effective or very effective, and more than 75% believed equipment has a significant or great impact on patient outcomes.

• Difference: The study strengthened for awareness of how reliable equipment directly supports workflow and patient safety.

7. Continuous Improvement and Training Frequency

• Pre‑study: Participation in refresher training was inconsistent, with some nurses rarely attending.

• Post‑study: More than half reported always attending refresher sessions, and another 12.9% said often.

• Difference: The study fostered a culture of continuous learning, embedding regular training into professional practice.

Conclusion: the study concluded that there was satisfactory level of knowledge @practics among nurses at selected hospitals River Nile state. Nurses’ knowledge of intensive care unit protocols

Recommendations: improve the quality of nursing knowledge should focus more studies to be conducted to improve nurses’ level of Knowledge@practics regarding of intensive care unit protocols for critical care nurses.

 

 

1.INTRODUCTION

A hospital's intensive care unit is a specially staffed and equipped area devoted to the care of patients who have life-threatening diseases, accidents, or complications.  evolved from postoperative treatment rooms and respiratory units in the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s, when it became apparent that grouping the sickest patients together was advantageous. Positive energy that comes and goes.

With studies into the pathophysiological pathways, treatment regimens, and outcomes of the critically ill, as well as the establishment of specialty journals, educational programs, and credentials dedicated to intensive care,

 The intensive care unit should be close to specific acute locations, such as operating rooms, emergency rooms, Cardiac care units, labor wards, and acute wards, as well as investigational units (e.g. radiology department, cardiac catheterization laboratory). A large number of lifts, along with doors and corridors, should be available to safely move critically ill patients to and from the intensive care unit (1,).

Intensive care unit is highly specified and sophisticated area of a hospital which is specifically designed, staffed, located, furnished and equipped, dedicated to management of critically sick patient, injuries or complications. It is a department with dedicated medical, nursing and allied staff. It operates with defined policies; protocols and procedures should have its own quality control, education, training and research programmers. It is emerging as a separate specialty and can no longer be regarded purely as part of anesthesia, Medicine, surgery or any other specialty. It has to have its own separate team in terms of doctors, nursing personnel and other staff who are tuned to the requirement of the specialty (2).

Care of the critically ill patient is often punctuated with physiologic changes that require immediate attention. Given the frequency of emergent interventions, clinicians may be distracted from important, less urgent tasks that are still essential for optimal patient care. For this and other reasons, the utilization of protocols in the Intensive care unit can potentially improve the care of the critically ill patient. Because of the complexities of caring for the critically ill patient, the use of protocols in the intensive care unit has become increasingly common. We will review the definition of a protocol, discuss their advantages, and highlight some of their limitations and potential for harm with their use (3) .  

  High standard of intensive care medicine is influenced by good design and adequate space.

 Whenever renovations or new structures are being planned there are certain features which must be considered. The total area of the ICU should be 2.5-3 times the patient care area. Patient area – in adult ICUs at least 20m2 of floor area is required for each beds pace in an open area exclusive of service areas and circulation space.

Single rooms should be at least 25 m2. Pediatric ICUs may use less than 20m2 when using cots rather than beds.

 There must be adequate access to the head of each bed. Working area – the working area must include adequate space for staff to work in comfort while maintaining visual contact with the patient

 Adequate space must be allowed for patient monitoring, resuscitation equipment and medical storage areas (including a refrigerator).

The unit needs space for a mobile x-ray machine, and associated equipment.  The x-ray viewing facilities must enable simultaneous viewing of multiple x-rays.  There should be adequate room for telephones and other communication systems, computers and data collection equipment and storage of stationery.  Adequate space for a receptionist and/or ward clerk must be available. Environment – the unit should have appropriate air conditioning which allows control of temperature, humidity and air change. Pharmacy/drug preparation area – for clean and rapid drug and fluid preparation Equipment storage area  e.g. for monitors, ventilators, infusion pumps, dialysis equipment, disposables, fluids, drip stands, trolleys, blood warmers, suction apparatus, linen, large items of special equipment.

Dirty utility  area for cleaning appliances, urine testing, emptying and cleaning bed pans and urine bottles.  Unit design should provide appropriate movement pathways for contaminated equipment. Staff facilities – should be sited close to the patient area and have adequate communication with it. They should allow for relaxation and debriefing during breaks Relatives area – a separate waiting area must be available (with drinks dispenser, radio, television and    comfortable seating desirable).  A separate interview room and a separate area for distressed relatives must be available and overnight rooms for relatives should also be considered. (4)

 There are multiple definitions for protocols as 'sets of explicit, algorithmic rules, which direct clinical management or research (5)          

 Protocols as 'precise and detailed plans for the study of a medical or biomedical problem and/or for a regimen of therapy', which should be differentiated from guidelines (6)

 

3.1 General objective:

To design and implement intensive care unit protocol for critical care nurses in Khartoum state public hospitals

3.2 Specific objectives:

To assess critical care nurse’s knowledge regarding routine care pre post program

To assess critical care nurse’s practice regarding routine care and unit adjustment pre post program.

To identify the impact of protocol on intensive care unit nurse’s knowledge and performance.

 

 

 

2. Materials and Methods:

2.1 Study design

Quasi experimental study River Nile hospital -based study was conducted during the period (September 2024 – march 2025).

 

2. 2 STUDY AREA River Nile, including Shandi Teaching Hospital 13 nurses, almak Nimr university Hospital 18 nurses, Atbara locality which includes Atbara Teaching Hospital 26 nurses DamarLocality, Aldamar Teaching Hospital 13nurse

2.3 Study Population

The study targeted all nurses working in critical care units in the study area according to criteria of selection.

2.3.1 Inclusion criteria:

The nurses recruited in the study included those who:

·       Nurses who are working for more than 6 months.

·       Willing to participate in the Study.

·       Nurses with diploma and above.

2.3.2 Exclusion Criteria:

Nurses who were excluded from the study included those:

·       Nurses in an internship period

·       Non-permanent contract.

2.4 Sample size and Sample technique.

2.4.1 Sample size:

The researcher was selecting the sample for all nurses how fulfil the above criteria in critical care unit at governmental hospitals in  River Nile State.

2.4.2 Sample technique

The study was total enumeration research hence there was total coverage purposive size.

2.5 Study Variables

Available is achactrisics or quality that take one different value for example it varies from one person or object to another.

 2.5.1 Independent Variable:

The independent variable includes (age, gender, education

, experience.).

2.5.2 Dependent Variable

Dependent Variable means the variable hypothesized to depen on or be caused by another variable (the independent variable) in this study. the dependent Variables Knowledge of the nurses regarding ethical issues in critical care unit.

2.6 Data Collection instrument 

The date collection instrument consists of two sections as follow:

 2.6.1 section one

The first part of the tool related to demographic characteristics of the nurses such as age, gender, education, experience.

2.6.2 section two

Close end knowledge questionnaire, Consist of 15 questions with 4 correct answers in each question. The mean score of all questions were calculated for each nurse.

2.6.2.1 Scoring Interpretation of Knowledge by using overall mean scale scoring.

The scoring of the nurse’s knowledge based on response of a 3 -point Likert scale scoring that ranged from one to four (3-4 =Adequate knowledge

2- 3 = Moderate knowledge 1-2 = Inadequate knowledge).

2.8 Validity of the Questionnaire

The Questionnaire for data collection was designed from literature review and presented to the supervisor and other experts in the field of research and ethics that ensured the face, some modifications have been made, content and construct validity before it was used for the study.

 2.9 Reliability of Tool

A Pilot study was conducted to assess study tools clarity and applicability. It has also served in estimating the time needed for fulfilling the study tools. The revised questionnaires were piloted to investigate the feasibility of data collection tools. Collecting pilot study data lasts for one week. No modification had occurred in the pilot study, so it was included in the main study subject.

2.10 Ethical consideration    

 Approval from the Karari university faculty of graduate studies & scientific research is done. involved official parties like state ministry of health.

Research committee and administration of the hospitals will be informed about data collection and the aims of the research. Verbal informed consent will be requested from all respondents to participate in the study after fully explaining the research purpose and objectives in the simple words. Names of the respondents will not be used in the report. the questionnaire will be filled out during their rest time.

confidentiality of the information gathered will be assured. respondents have a right to withdraw at any time during the research, however, their right to refuse to participate in the study will be respected and they will not lose the right to any benefits from the research. all necessary precautions and precautionary measures for covid -19 in the hospitals will be followed.

result

 

Section 1:  Demographic and Professional Information

 

Percentiles

Std. d

Mean

Missing

Valid

Item

75

50

25

2.26

1.64

1.12

0.562

1.66

0

70

 

age

1.84

1.34

 

0.478

1.34

0

70

Gender

1.84

1.24

 

0.765

1.37

0

70

Educational Level

 

3.48

2.84

0.750

3.40

0

70

Total Years of Nursing Experience

3.97

2.91

1.83

1.271

2.91

0

70

Years of Experience in the “ICU”

 

1.77

1.27

0.423

1.77

0

70

Employment Status

3.29

2.16

1.23

1.151

2.26

0

70

Hospital/Locality

 

 

 

Section 2: Knowledge Assessment on ICU Protocols and Design

 

 

Percentiles

S.D

mean

valid

Item

75

50

25

 

 

 

 

4.67

3.88

3.00b

1.169

3.71

70

How familiar are you with the current “ICU” protocols at your hospital?

7.17

2.81

1.76b

3.689

4.57

70

Key Elements of “ICU” Protocols:
Select all the elements you consider essential for an effective “ICU” protocol

 

4.49

3.90b

0.806

4.40

70

Importance of “ICU” Design:
In your opinion, how important is the standardized design (space, equipment, and layout) of an “ICU” in enhancing patient care?

4.89

4.23

3.32b

0.983

4.07

70

Understanding of Clinical Protocols:
Please rate your level of understanding of key clinical protocols

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 3: Practice Assessment

Routine Use of Protocols@ Essential Elements for “ICU” Admission:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentiles

S.D

mean

valid

item

75

50

25

 

 

4.59

3.95b

1.013

4.40

70

In your daily practice, how often do you follow the established “ICU” protocols?

 

4.98

4.43

3.77b

0.762

4.36

70

Consistency in Routine Care Procedures:
How consistent is the application of routine care procedures in your unit?

 

4.97

4.39

3.69b

0.870

4.29

70

Comfort with Critical Care Procedures:
How comfortable are you with performing critical care procedures following the “ICU” protocols?

 

 

4.52

3.92b

0.935

4.37

70

Please indicate your level of agreement with the statement:
"Standardized “ICU” protocols improve patient outcomes."

 

2.46

1.58

.b,c

1.098

1.80

 

70

Essential Elements for “ICU” Admission:
Which elements do you believe are essential for an effective “ICU” admission? (Select all that apply)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 4:

ISBAR Handover Protocol@ Infection Control Measures

@ Daily Nursing Roles and Unit Adjustment

 

 

Percentiles

S.D

mean

valid

 

75

50

25

 

4.59

4.05b

4.59a

4.49

70

5.2   Infection Control Measures
Confidence in Infection Control Measures:
How confident are you in applying infection control measures in the “ICU”?

5.48

4.74

3.75b

4.74a

4.36

70

Which of the following infection control practices do you consistently follow? (Select all that apply)

2.50

1.45

. b,c

1.45a

1.80

70

5.3  ISBAR Handover Protocol
Frequency of ISBAR Handover:

How frequently do you use the ISBAR method during patient handover?

 

2.69

2.19b

2.69a

2.69

70

5.4 Documentation and Reporting
Familiarity with Documentation Protocols:
How familiar are you with “ICU” documentation protocols (including patient records and incident reporting)?

4.91

4.36

3.68b

4.36a

4.26

70

5.5 Daily Nursing Roles and Unit Adjustment
Effectiveness of Daily Nursing Responsibilities:
How would you rate the effectiveness of the current daily nursing responsibilities in your “ICU”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Section 5: Use of Devices and Equipment in the ICU

item

Percentiles

S.D

mean

valid

 

 

 

75

50

25

 

4.86

4.23

3.39

4.23

4.4

70

6.1 Familiarity and Training
Familiarity with “ICU” Equipment: How familiar are you with operating the essential “ICU” equipment (e.g., ventilators, monitors, infusion pumps, portable X-ray machines, suction devices, etc.)?

 

4.90

4.29

3.50

4.29

4.17

70

6.2 Confidence and Troubleshooting
Troubleshooting Confidence:
How confident are you in troubleshooting common issues with “ICU” devices (e.g., ventilator alarms, infusion pump errors)?

 

4.90

4.23

3.38

4.29

4.13

70

Effectiveness of Equipment Maintenance:
How effective is the current equipment maintenance and replacement program in your “ICU”?

 

 

4.43

3.54

4.43

4.19

70

6.3 Impact on Patient Care and Workflow
Impact on Patient Outcomes:
To what extent do you believe that the functionality and availability of “ICU” devices and equipment affect patient care outcomes?


Discussion

The comparative analysis between pre‑study and post‑study results underscores the profound impact of the “ICU” training program on both technical competence and professional confidence among nurses. Prior to the intervention,,, participants demonstrated only moderate familiarity with infection control protocols,,, documentation standards,,, and equipment use. Confidence levels varied considerably,,, with some nurses relying on fragmented practices such as hand hygiene alone or occasional documentation,,, rather than adopting a comprehensive,,, system‑oriented approach. This variability reflected gaps in training and highlighted the need for structured educational reinforcement.

Following the training,,, however,,, the results shifted dramatically. The majority of nurses reported consistently applying all infection control measures—hand hygiene,,, PPE use,,, equipment disinfection,,, and isolation protocols—together as an integrated system. Confidence in documentation protocols rose sharply,,, with most participants describing themselves as “very familiar,,,” thereby reducing risks of inconsistency in patient records and incident reporting. Technical proficiency also improved: nearly 80% of nurses reported being “very” or “extremely familiar” with “ICU” equipment,,, and more than 80% expressed strong confidence in troubleshooting alarms and errors. These findings illustrate how structured training transforms uncertainty into resilience,,, enabling nurses to respond effectively to the complex demands of critical care.

The program’s influence extended beyond individual skills to broader workflow and patient outcomes. Nurses overwhelmingly recognized that equipment functionality and availability have a “great” or “significant” impact on patient care,,, reflecting heightened awareness of the link between technology reliability and clinical safety. Similarly,,, perceptions of daily nursing responsibilities shifted toward effectiveness,,, with more than 90% rating their roles as “effective” or “very effective” post‑study. This suggests that the training not only improved technical knowledge but also clarified role expectations,,, strengthened teamwork,,, and enhanced confidence in daily routines.

Another notable outcome was the increased participation in refresher training and simulation sessions. More than half of the respondents reported “always” attending such sessions,,, compared to inconsistent participation before the study. This shift indicates that the program fostered a culture of continuous learning,,, embedding regular practice and reinforcement into professional identity. Sustained engagement in training is critical in high‑acuity environments,,, where rapid technological changes and evolving infection control challenges demand ongoing adaptation.

Taken together,,, these findings highlight the effectiveness of structured “ICU” training in embedding best practices,,, strengthening confidence,,, and promoting a culture of safety and continuous improvement. They also align with previous studies that emphasize the value of competency‑based education and simulation in critical care nursing (Pandian et al.,,, 2024; Hill & Lamichhane,,, 2024; Rebmann,,, 2025). The convergence between our results and prior literature reinforces the conclusion that targeted training programs are essential for bridging gaps in practice,,, standardizing protocols,,, and ultimately improving patient outcomes.

At the same time,,, the presence of small groups reporting lower confidence or familiarity reminds us that variability persists even after training. Addressing these gaps requires ongoing mentorship,,, peer support,,, and institutional commitment to continuous education. Future programs should therefore integrate regular evaluation,,, individualized feedback,,, and adaptive learning strategies to ensure that all nurses achieve and sustain high levels of competence.

In summary,,, the “ICU” training program proved transformative,,, shifting nurses from fragmented practices to comprehensive,,, system‑oriented approaches,,, strengthening confidence in documentation and equipment use,,, and embedding continuous learning into daily routines. These changes not only enhance patient safety and workflow efficiency but also contribute to the professional growth and resilience of “ICU” nurses.

 

REFRANCE

 

1-Hawker, F. (2008). Design and organization of intensive care units. OH’s Intensive Care Manual E-Book, (1.)

2-Rungta, N., Gavel, D., & Nanina, S. (2010). ICU planning and designing in India–guidelines 2010. ISCCM Guidelines Committee. (2)

3-Chang, S. Y., Saransk, J., & Martin, G. S. (2012). Protocols in the management of critical illness. Critical care, 16(3)

4- Unit, I. L. I. I. C. (2003). MINIMUM STANDARDS FOR INTENSIVE CARE UNITS. Bulletin Vol, 12(4).

5-Fessler, H. E., & Brower, R. G. (2005). Protocols for lung protective ventilation. Critical care medicine, 33(3), S223-S227.) (5)

6-Morris, A. H. (2003). Treatment algorithms and protocol zed care. Current opinion in critical care, 9(3), 236-240.(6)

7- Jordan, Joanne, et al. "Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence‐synthesis." Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 10 (2016). (7)

8-Yi-Chen Lin, Rui-Ling Chang, Chia-Chun Tang. Safety and Efficacy of Nurse-led weaning Protocols on ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing. 2025.March 24; 22 (8).

 

 

9-Bani Hamad, Dania & Rababa, Mohammad & Al-Rimawi, Rula & Bani Mohammad, Islam & Ali, Raeda & AL-Easa, Hala.sep (2025). Barriers and Facilitators Affecting the Implementation of the Sepsis Six Protocol by Nurses in Acute Care Settings in Jordan: A Cross-Sectional Study. SAGE Open Nursing. 11. 10.1177 (9)

10- Ashraf, Summia & Sarwar, Hajra & Hassan, Nabeela & Tariq, Misbah & Maryam, Hina & Qadir, Ayesha. (2025). Effects of Standardized Protocol Interventions on Nurses’ Knowledge and Practices of Oral Care for Bedridden Patients. Journal of Health, Wellness and Community Research. e749. 10.61919/03zq1030 (10)

11- Yang, Eunjung & Shin, Hyunsook. (2017). Adherence to Clinical Guideline for Endotracheal Suction in ICU Nurses. Journal of East-West Nursing Research. 23. 53-62. 10.14370/jewnr.2017.23.1.53 (11)

12 -World Health Organization. (2020). Infection prevention and control in health care. WHO Guidelines (12)

13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2021). Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. CDC Publications.

14. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. (2019). Effective handover communication in critical care. IHI Reports. (14)

15. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses. (2022). Standards for acute and critical care nursing practice. AACN Guidelines. (15)

16. Smith, J., & Brown, L. (2021). Impact of structured “ICU” training on nurse confidence and patient outcomes. Journal of Critical Care Nursing, 36(4), 215‑223.

6. Pandian, V., Rahimi-Bashar, F., Gohari-Moghadam, K., Senol Celik, S., Ait Hssain, A., & Vahedian-Azimi, A. (2024). Impact of evidence-based standardized training on competencies in critical care nurses: A quasi-experimental study. Intensive Care Research, 4, 72–79.

17 . Al Huraiz, K. H., & Talaqof, F. A. (2012). The impact of “ICU” nurses’ experience and training on patient safety and outcomes. Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy, 1(1), 46–55.

18. Hill, B., & Lamichhane, G. (2024). Infection prevention and control: Critical strategies for nursing practice. British Journal of Nursing, 33(17), 1024–1030.

19. Rebmann, T. (2025). Infection preventionists’ current and preferred training strategies and tools. American Journal of Infection Control, 53(1), 2–7.

20. American Journal of Infection Control. (2025). Infection control nursing competency model for nurses in intensive care units: A Delphi study. AJIC, 53(2), 203–209.

21. CDC & AHA. (2023). Competency-based training for infection prevention. New Jersey Hospital Association.