Acute Toxicity, Anti-oxidative, and Anti-inflammatory Activities of a Combination of Zingiber officinale, Allium sativum, and Doxorubicin in Wister Rats Model
Oraekei Daniel Ikechukwu1,2*, Okonkwo Chukwuemeka Micheal1, Mba Ogbonnaya1, Abone Harrison Odera3, Obidiegwu Onyeka Chinwuba4, Chukwuka Benjamin Uzodinma1.
1Department
of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences,
Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria.
2Department
of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Oliva University, Number 4 & 5 Mayugi Avenue, Mukaza, Bujumbura, Burundi.
3Department
of Pharmaceutical Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria.
4Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, PMB 5025 Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria.
Oraekei
Daniel Ikechukwu email: di.oraekei@unizik.edu.ng
Okonkwo
Chukwuemeka Micheal email: Michaelfact91@gmail.com
Mba
Ogbonnaya email: mbabte@gmail.com
Abone Harrison
Odera email: harrisonabone@gmail.com
Obidiegwu Onyeka Chinwuba email: oc.obidiegwu@unizik.edu.ng
Chukwuka
Benjamin Uzodinma email: cb.uzodimma@unizik.edu.ng
*Corresponding
author
Dr.
Oraekei Daniel Ikechukwu,
Department
of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Oliva
University, Number 4 & 5 Mayugi Avenue, Mukaza, Bujumbura, Burundi.
Email:
di.oraekei@unizik.edu.ng
Phone:
+2348061629459; +25771629919
ABSTRACT
Background: Herb-drug combination therapy involves using
herbal remedies together with conventional drugs. This can lead to beneficial
or harmful interactions. These interactions can affect drug metabolism,
efficacy, and toxicity, and can alter the way the body processes and responds
to drugs, leading to enhanced effectiveness or causing toxicity. Objectives: This study aimed to
evaluate the safety of a blend of Zingiber officinale, Allium sativum,
and doxorubicin for a possible drug-herb combination against breast cancer. Methods: Z. officinale, and A.
sativum were extracted with 95% methanol, and the extracts were subjected
to phytochemical analysis, acute toxicity study, anti-oxidant, and
anti-inflammatory tests were performed using standard methods. Results: Alkaloids, Saponins,
Flavonoids, and glycosides were present in Z. officinale, and Tannins,
Steroids, and terpenoids were absent. In A. sativum, alkaloids,
flavonoids, glycosides, and tannins were present, while saponins, steroids, and
terpenoids were absent. No mortality was observed throughout the observational
period. In group 5, doxorubicin alone had a reduction of superoxide dismutase
(1.298 ± 0.03 mg/ml) that was even worse than the reduction caused by
lipopolysaccharide. This was ameliorated by a 6:4 blend of Z. officinale: A.
sativum, which, when given together with doxorubicin, raised the superoxide
dismutase to 2.944 ± 0.11 mg/ml. This herbal blend also decreased nuclear
factor kappa β from 9.364 ± 0.19 ng/ml in the doxorubicin-only group to 6.324 ±
0.22 ng/ml when the herbs were blended with doxorubicin. Conclusion: The 6:4 blend of Z. officinale: A. sativum may
be useful in preventing the side effects of doxorubicin, especially those
resulting from oxidative stress and inflammation.
Keywords:
Acute toxicity, Allium sativum, Anti-inflammatory, Anti-oxidant, Zingiber
officinale.
INTRODUCTION
Background
of the study
Herb-drug combination therapy can lead to either beneficial effects or
toxic interactions (Bukowska et al.,
2025). These interactions can affect drug metabolism and efficacy, and can
alter the body's responses to drugs, leading to enhanced effectiveness or
adverse reactions (Gamil et al.,
2025). Some herbs may enhance the effects of orthodox drugs and may require a
reduction of the dose of the orthodox drug (Ameade et al., 2018). This may reduce the adverse effects and improve
treatment outcomes. On the other hand, certain combinations can lead to
treatment failure and adverse effects such as increased risk of bleeding,
serotonin syndrome, or liver damage (Czigle et
al., 2023). Evidence has shown that
incorporating Chinese herbal medicines into synthetic drug-based therapies
delivers benefits in the treatment of many multifactorial diseases (Li et al., 2022). Herb-drug interactions
may be due to the interactions between the phytochemicals in the herbal
medicines and active ingredients of prescription drugs (Borse et al., 2019). This can occur through
several mechanisms that can be classified as either pharmacokinetic or
pharmacodynamic interactions (Gouws & Hamman, 2020). The concurrent use of
herbal medicines and conventional drugs is of important concern in breast
cancer treatment (Al-Masri et al.,
2025). It is recommended that oncologists and clinical pharmacologists should
take into account the challenges associated with herb-drug interactions in
their routine practices, particularly during chemotherapy among cancer patients
(Bazrafshani et al., 2023). Z. officinale and A. sativum combination had anti-breast cancer activities and
decreased breast tumor volume, tumor weight, and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3)
(Ihekwereme et al., 2024).
Consequently, a combination of these two herbs and doxorubicin is expected to
interact synergistically to treat breast cancer, especially when the breast
cancer is diagnosed early.
Statement
of the problem
Treatment of breast
cancer and cancer in general with Pharmaceutical/orthodox drugs was known to be
followed by a lot of adverse effects. This may be due to the mechanisms through
which orthodox anti-breast cancer drugs perform their action. Doxorubicin acts
by generating free radicals that kill cancerous cells. But these free radicals
can also affect body organs and tissues. This study therefore verified whether
blending doxorubicin with herbs with proven anti-oxidative and
anti-inflammatory activities will work synergistically in breast cancer
treatment.
Justification
Z.
officinale and A. sativum had good anti-breast
cancer activities comparable to that of doxorubicin at the ratio of 6:4
(318:212 mg/kg body weight). (Ihekwereme et al., 2024). It was
recommended that these two herbs, blended with doxorubicin, should be studied
further to find out if such a blend will synergistically bring about a radical
cure for breast cancer. This present study evaluated the safety of such a blend
as a stepping stone to considering such a drug-herb blend.
Aim
This study aimed to
evaluate the safetyof a blend of Z. officinale, A. sativum, and
doxorubicin for a possible drug-herb combination against breast cancer.
Specific
objectives
·
To carry out an acute toxicity study of a blend
ofZ. officinale, A. sativum, and doxorubicin.
·
To evaluate the anti-oxidative effects of a
blend ofZ. officinale, A. sativum, and doxorubicin.
· To estimate the anti-inflammatory activities of a blend of Z. officinale, A. sativum, and doxorubicin.
Scope
of the study
This study was narrowed
down to investigating the drug-herb interaction between Z. officinale, A.
sativum, and doxorubicin. A blend of these three ingredients was prepared
and subjected to acute toxicity testing as to ascertain the safety of such a
combination. Superoxide dismutase (SOD) assay was carried out to indicate the
antioxidant potential of the blend. The combination of Z. officinale, A.
sativum methanol extracts, and doxorubicin was tested for its
effectiveness in inhibiting inflammation caused by carrageenan-induced paw
edema.
Expected
outcome
Because Z. officinale, A. sativum, and doxorubicin had been individually confirmed to be safe, it is expected that a blend of the three drugs will also be safe. Doxorubicin works by generating free radicals that destroy breast cancer cells, while the two herbs, Z. officinale and A. sativum, were confirmed in several previous studies to have remarkable antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. It is therefore expected that a blend of these three drugs will have antagonistic effects with respect to oxidative stress and inflammation responses. However, this is desirable in breast cancer treatment, whereby the herbs will ameliorate the oxidative stress caused by treatment with doxorubicin.
Literature
review
Herbal drugs have a long history of use in traditional medicine, and they are increasingly attracting attention and being integrated into modern pharmacotherapy (Yuan et al., 2016). Even though some herbal medicines have shown effectiveness, they should be used with caution, and healthcare providers should be consulted, especially while using them together with synthetic drugs. The practice of herbal drug use dates back to ancient civilizations, where plants were revered for their healing properties (Petrovska et al., 2012). Traditional medical systems like Ayurveda, Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), and Native American remedies all bear witness to the historical significance of herbal medicine (Coopoosamy et al., 2023). Approximately 80% of the global population is estimated to use herbal medicinal products for their therapeutic benefits (Balkrishna et al., 2024). Plants' different natural products have inspired the design, discovery, and development of new drugs (Chaachauay et al., 2024). Currently, there are worldwide initiatives targeted at finding herbal treatments in plants and promoting them using a reliable drug delivery system for people, based on the fact that each disease’s cure can be found in nature (Hardeep SG, 2023).
Some
research documents on herb-drug combinations
The phenomenon of herb-drug interactions is of significant importance in clinical practice, particularly when conventional medications and herbal remedies are used concomitantly. These interactions can result in a range of effects, including increased bleeding risk, serotonin syndrome, and decreased drug bioavailability, among other adverse effects (Fugh-Berman, 2000). Therefore, healthcare professionals need to be aware of potential herb-drug interactions. They should also contribute to providing solutions for the risks. Some of these solutions include rendering patient education and monitoring the patients. However, some herb-drug interactions can be synergistic, whereby the effects of the blend are greater than either of the herb or drug given alone (Zhou et al., 2016). The possibility of herbal medicines and conventional drugs being concurrently used is high (Pan et al., 2022). There is a need to improve phytovigilance of the potential harms and benefits as a result of the combined use of herbal medications with pharmaceutical drugs (Babos et al., 2021). Natural products, including crude extracts, herbal formulas, and bioactive compounds from plants, hold great potential to prevent and treat cancers (Wang et al., 2012). More importantly, some herbal drugs can reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced toxicity, including oral mucositis, gastrointestinal toxicity, and hepatotoxicity (Fu et al., 2018). This confers on herbal drugs the great potential as adjuvant therapy for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced side effects (Okem et al., 2023). Herb-drug interaction could remain unidentified in the case where there is limited knowledge of the effects of herbal medicines and their safety (Amaeze et al., 2020).
Pharmacological
uses of Z. officinale and A. sativum
Ginger's
pharmacological uses are diverse, encompassing anti-inflammatory, anti-nausea,
and antioxidant properties, among others. It is used for conditions like
arthritis, nausea, and vomiting, and some studies suggested potential benefits
in managing heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Z. officinale is one of
the most widely used natural products consumed as a spice and medicine for
treating diabetes, flatulent intestinal colic, indigestion, infertility,
inflammation, insomnia, a memory booster, nausea, rheumatism, stomach ache, and
urinary tract infections (Unuofin et al., 2021). A. sativum, on
the other hand, has a range of pharmacological uses, including its potential to
manage blood pressure, support cardiovascular health, enhance immunity, and
potentially protect against cancer. It is also known for its antimicrobial,
anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. A certain study reported that A.
sativum is an aromatic herbaceous plant that is consumed worldwide as food
and a traditional remedy for various diseases. It has been reported to possess
several biological properties, including anticarcinogenic, antioxidant,
antidiabetic, renoprotective, anti-atherosclerotic, antibacterial, antifungal,
and antihypertensive activities in traditional medicines (El-Saber et al.,
2020). A. sativum has a high medicinal value and is used to cure a
variety of human diseases. It has anti-inflammatory, rheumatological, ulcer
inhibiting, anticholinergic, analgesic, antimicrobial, antistress,
antidiabetes, anticancer, liver protection, anthelmintics, antioxidants,
antifungal, and wound healing properties, as well as properties that help with
asthma, arthritis, chronic fever, tuberculosis, runny nose, malaria, leprosy,
skin discoloration, and itching, indigestion, colic, enlarged spleen,
hemorrhoids, fistula, bone fracture, gout, urinary tract disease, diabetes,
kidney stones, anemia, jaundice, epilepsy, cataract, and night blindness
(Tesfaye, 2021). Based on the fact that a blend of Z. officinale and
A. sativum at a ratio of 6:4 which is equivalent to 318:212 mg/kg body
weight, had remarkable anti-breast cancer activities and decreased breast tumor
volume, tumor weight and cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3) in a manner that is
comparable to a standard anti-breast cancer drug, doxorubicin (Ihekwereme et
al., 2024); this current study evaluated the safety of combining the blend
of these two herbs with doxorubicin for possible application in breast cancer
treatment.
Materials
and methods
Animals
Swiss female Albino
rats (230 – 240 g) were employed for the study. All the animals were obtained
from the animal house of the Department of Pharmacology, Enugu State University
of Science and Technology, Agbani. The animals were housed in standard laboratory
conditions of 12 hours’ light, room temperature, 40-60% relative humidity, and
fed with rodent feed (Guinea Feeds Nigeria Ltd). They were allowed free access
to food and water. All animal experiments were conducted in compliance with the
NIH guide for care and use of laboratory animals (National Institute of Health
(NIH), 2011), Pub No: 85-23). Animal protocol was approved by the Animal Care
and Ethics Committee of Enugu State University of Science and Technology with
approval number ESUT/2025/AEC/0962/AP 845. There was additional approval by the
Nnamdi Azikiwe University’s Ethical Committee for the use of Laboratory Animals
for Research Purposes (Approval number is NAU/AREC/2025/0077).
Drugs
Doxorubicin was the
only pharmaceutical drug used for this study.
Plant
material
Fresh Zingiber
officinale rhizome and Allium sativum bulb were purchased from
Ogbete main market in Enugu state, Nigeria.
Chemicals
and Reagents
Wash Buffer Concentrate
(Sigma Aldrich Germany), Assay Buffer (Alpco USA), TMB Substrate (Cayman
Chemical USA), Stop Solution (Cayman Chemical USA), Hydrochloric acid (Prime
laboratories, India); Dragendoff reagent (Sigma Aldrich, United States of
America); Ammonia (Shackti Industrial Gases, India), sodium hydroxide (Treveni
Chemical Pvt., India); Ferric chloride (AkashPurochem. Pvt., India); Fehling’s
solution (Lab care Diagnostics, India); Million reagent (Interlab Chemical
Pvt., India): Ethanol (TAJ Pharmaceutical Ltd., India); Acetic anhydride (Ashok
Organics Industries, India); Concentrated sulfuric acid (Navin Chemical Pvt.,
India), Acetic acid (Kayla Africa Suppliers, South Africa); Molisch reagent
(Interlab Chemical Pvt., India); alcoholic alpha naphatol (Prat Industry
Corcopation, India).
Equipment
Glass column, flasks, beakers, test tubes, measuring cylinders, surgical blade, forceps, scissors, graph paper, white transparent paper, rotary evaporator, Analytical Weighing Balance (Metler H30, Switzerland), Electric Oven (Gallenkamp, England), Spectrophotometer (B. Bran Scientific &Instrument Company, England), Water Bath (Techmel & Techmel, Texas, USA), National Blender (Japan), Micropippete (Finnipipette® Labsystems, Finland), Plethysmometer (Biodevices, New Delhi, India) and Intubation tubes. Precision pipettes (25, 50, 100 and 300 μl, 1,000 µL) (Labcompare USA); Disposable pipette tips (Labcompare USA); Distilled or deionized water (SnowPure Water Technologies USA); Plate shaker (Biocompare USA); Microwell plate reader (BioTek India); Centrifuge (Sharplex Filters Pvt., India); Vortex mixer (Bionics Scientific Technologies (P) LTD, India); Graduated cylinder for 500 ml (Boenmed Healthcare Co. Ltd, Hong Kong); Stop watch (Avi Scientific India); EDTA containers (Sure Care Corporation), heparinized capillary tube (Thomas Scientific, USA), disposable hand gloves (Supermax Malaysia), toilet tissue.
Extraction
The Z. officinale and A. sativum were scraped, sliced, and pulverized to a powdered paste using an electronic blender and kept in clean, airtight amber colored bottles separately. Then, 400 g of each of the powdered plant material was cold macerated in 95% methanol. The mixture was allowed to stand for 3 days (72 hours) with intermittent agitation. It was filtered, and the filtrate was concentrated first using a vacuum rotary evaporator at 50ºC and then with a freeze dryer at -55ºC. The extracts were stored in a refrigerator until used.
Phytochemical
analysis
The qualitative
phytochemical analysis of the extracts was carried out using standard methods
described by Odoh et al. (2019).
Test for alkaloids
The plant extracts (0.2 g) were heated in 20 mL of 2% acid solution (HCL) individually in a water bath for about 2 minutes. The resulting solutions were allowed to cool, filtered, and then 5 mL of the filtrate was used for the Dragendorff’s test. To each labeled test tube, 5 mL of the sample was added, followed by1 mL of Dragendorff’s reagent. Formation of orange or red precipitates indicated the presence of an alkaloid.
Test for glycosides
The samples were
extracted with 1% H2SO4 solution in a hot water bath for about 2 minutes. The
resulting solution was filtered and made distinctly alkaline by adding 4 drops
of 20% KOH (confirmed with litmus paper). One milliliter of Fehling’s solution
(equal volume of A and B) was added to the filtrates and heated on a hot water
bath for 2 minutes. Brick red precipitate indicated the presence of glycosides.
Test for saponins
The plant extracts and
fractions (0.2 g) were dissolved in methanol individually, and the resulting
solutions were used for the Frothing test: The samples (5 mL) were placed in
labeled test tubes, and 5 mL of distilled water was added; the mixtures were shaken
vigorously. The test tubes were observed for the presence of persistent froth.
Test for tannins
The plant extracts (0.2
g) were dissolved in methanol individually, and the resulting solutions were
used for the test. To 3 mL of each of the samples, a few drops of 1% Ferric
chloride were added and observed for brownish green or a blue-black coloration.
Test for flavonoids
Using methanol, 0.2 g of the plant extracts was dissolved individually, and the resulting solutions were used for the Ammonium hydroxide test. A quantity of 2 mL of 10% ammonia solution was added to a portion of each of the samples and allowed to stand for 2 minutes. Yellow coloration at the lower ammoniacal layer indicated the presence of a flavonoid.
Test for steroids and terpenoids
Salkowski test: The plant extracts were dissolved in methanol individually, and the resulting solutions were used for the test. A 5 mL of each of the samples was mixed with 2 mL of chloroform, and concentrated H2SO4 was carefully added to form a layer. A reddish-brown coloration at the interface indicated a positive test.
Acute
toxicity study
Acute oral toxicity of
the combination of Z. officinale, A. sativum (6:4), and doxorubicin at
318, 212, and 5 mg/kg body weight, respectively, was performed according to the
Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline 425 for
testing of chemicals (Up and down method). The single combination dose was
administered to the animal based on their body weight. The animals were closely
observed for the first 30 minutes, then for 4 hours. Food was provided after 2
hours of dosing. After the survival of the first treated animal, 4 more animals
were treated with the same dose at an interval of 48 hours each. The control
group of rats (n = 5) was administered with distilled water (vehicle used in
preparing the herbal mixture) in the same volume as that of the treated group.
All the groups were closely observed for 6 hours and then at regular intervals
for 14 days. The animals were weighed and observed for mortality, salivation,
diarrhea, asthenia, hypoactivity, hyperactivity, piloerection, hyperventilation,
aggressiveness, yellowing or loss of hair fur, drowsiness, convulsion.
Experimental
design
Bacterial
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Escherichia coli, purchased from Sigma-Aldrich,
was used to induce systemic inflammatory and oxidative stress states. The
animals were pretreated for 14 days with the combined extracts of Z. officinale, A. sativum alone, the combination of the extracts with doxorubicin,
and doxorubicin alone. LPS at 1 mg/kg i.p dissolved in normal saline was given
daily to the animals along with the treatments for an additional 14 days.
Treatment was done 30 minutes before the LPS injection. On the last day, 2 hours
after injection of LPS, the animals were anesthetized with ketamine and
xylazine, and blood samples were withdrawn from the retro-orbital plexus of the
animals into plain tubes.
Animal
grouping (5 animals per group)
A total of 25 rats were grouped into five with five rats in each group. Group
1 were un-induced control/naïve and were treated with normal saline injection +
5 ml/kg distilled water orally (p.o.). Group 2 were the negative control which
were treated with LPS 1 mg/kg intraperitoneal (i.p.) + 5 ml/kg distilled water
p.o.). Group 3 rats were treated with Z. officinale and A. sativun
combination 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg p.o.) + LPS 1mg/kg i.p. Group 4 were treated
with Z. officinale: A. sativun: (318:212: 5 mg/kg) and doxorubicin blend
+ LPS 1 mg/kg i.p). While Group 5 were treated with doxorubicin (5 mg/kg i. p.).
Serum
preparation
At the end of the
study, blood samples were collected through retro-orbital plexus into a plain
covered test tube. After collection of the whole blood, the blood samples were
allowed to clot by leaving them undisturbed at room temperature for 30 minutes.
The clots were removed by centrifuging at 2,000 x g for 10 minutes in a
refrigerated centrifuge. The resulting supernatant (serum) was immediately
transferred into a clean polypropylene tube using a Pasteur pipette. The
samples were maintained at 2–8°C while handling and apportioned into 0.5 ml
aliquots.
Antioxidant
Activity
Serum
Superoxide Dismutase (SOD) Assay Procedure
Assay of SOD was
performed using the ElabScience kit (USA) following the manufacturer's
instructions. The ELISA kit uses the Competitive-ELISA principle. The micro
ELISA plate provided in the kit has been pre-coated with Rat SOD1. First wells
for diluted standard, blank, and sample were determined. Then, 50 µl each of
the dilutions of standard, blank, and samples were added into the appropriate
wells. Thereafter, 50 µl of Biotinylated Detection Ab working solution was
added to each well immediately. The plate was covered with the sealer provided
in the kit and incubated for 45 min at 37 ℃. Solution from each well was
decanted, followed by the addition of 350 µl of wash buffer to each well.
Excess conjugate and unbound sample or standard are washed from the plate three
times, and 100 µl Avidin conjugated to Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) were added
to each microplate well and incubated for 30 minutes at 37 °C. The solution
from each well was decanted and the washing process repeated for 5 times. Then
90 µl of Substrate Reagent was added to each well, covered, and incubated for
15 min at 37 °C in the dark. The enzyme-substrate reaction was terminated by
the addition of 50 µl of Stop Solution to each well, and the color change was
measured by spectrophotometry at a wavelength of 450 nm. The concentration of
Rat SOD1 in the samples was then determined by comparing the OD of the samples
to the standard curve.
Determination
of anti-inflammatory activity
Nuclear
factor kappa B (NF-kβ) assay
Serum NF-kβ activity
was estimated by quantitative sandwich enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) technique as
described by Jin et al. (2005) using rat-specific NF-kβ assay kit
(Elabscience Biotechnology Co., Ltd., China). One hundred microliters of the
serum samples and standards were placed in duplicates in their designated
wells. The wells were covered with a sealer and incubated at 37 °C for 90
minutes. After incubation, the fluids in the wells were emptied (without
washing), followed immediately by the addition of 100 µl of dilute biotinylated
detection antibody. The wells were covered again with a sealer, the contents
gently mixed and incubated for 60 minutes at 37 °C. After incubation, the
contents of the wells were emptied by decanting, and then the wells were washed
by adding 350 µl of dilute wash buffer to each well. This was allowed to soak
for 2 minutes and then the solution was decanted and the plate was patted dry
with a clean absorbent paper. The washing was repeated 3 times. Then 100 µl of
dilute horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate working solution was added to
each well, the plate/wells covered with a plate sealer and incubated at 37 °C for
30 minutes. After incubation, the contents of the wells were decanted, and the
plate was patted dry on absorbent paper. The wash process was repeated again 5
times, this time with 350 µl of dilute wash buffer, which was allowed to soak
for 1 minute during each wash. The plate was also emptied and patted dry during
each wash (5 times). After washing, 90 µl of substrate reagent was added to
each well, and the plate was covered with a new plate sealer. The plate was
incubated for 15 minutes at 37°Cwith the plate/wells well protected from light.
After incubation, 50 µl of stop solution was added to each well, and the absorbance
was read immediately at 450 nm.
Statistical
analysis
Results were presented as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean (S.E.M). Means were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey’s test for multiple comparisons. P < 0.05 was set to be statistically significant. Results analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS version 20.
Results
and Discussion
Results
Table
1: Phytochemical
analysis of Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum ethanol extracts
|
Phytocompounds |
Zingiber
officinale |
Allium sativum |
|
Alkaloids |
+ |
+ |
|
Saponins |
+ |
- |
|
Tannins |
- |
+ |
|
Flavonoids |
+ |
+ |
|
Steroids and
terpenoids |
- |
+ |
|
Glycosides |
+ |
- |
|
Yield |
44.8 g (11.2%) |
62.4 g (15.6%) |
Key: + = Present; - = Absent
Acute
toxicity study
Figure 1: Serum concentration of superoxide
dismutase (SOD)
Figure 2: Serum concentration of
nuclear factor kapper β (NF-kβ)
Discussion
Phytochemical
analysis
The phytochemicals present in Z.
officinal were alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, and glycosides, while
tannins, steroids, and terpenoids were absent. The phytochemicals present in A. sativum were alkaloids, tannins,
flavonoids, and steroids and terpenoids, while saponins and glycosideswere
absent. Phytochemicals, which are bioactive compounds found in plants, have
been reported to be responsible for the pharmacological activities of herbs (Kumar
et al., 2023). These compounds
contribute to the medicinal properties of plants and are the basis for many
traditional and modern herbal remedies. Indeed, phytochemical analysis and
pharmacological studies of traditional medicinal plants are integral to
validating their therapeutic potential (Jordan, 2024). Understanding the
phytochemical and therapeutic properties of medicinal plants is a key factor
for developing effective medicines (Rabizadeh et al., 2022).
Acute
toxicity study
No mortality was observed throughout the observational period. This
indicated that the blend of Z. officinale,
A. sativum, and doxorubicin was safe
at the administered doses of 318, 212, and 5 mg/kg body weight, respectively.
This outcome was exceptionally interesting because a blend of herbal and
pharmaceutical drugs is not necessarily safe for humans and can be risky. While
some herbal remedies may be beneficial, they can also interact negatively with
pharmaceutical drugs, potentially leading to harmful side effects or reduced
effectiveness of either the herb or the medication. But in this case, the
reverse was the case. According to an earlier study, the use of herbal
medicines is not without risk, and when they are administered together with
allopathic medicines, they can lead to herb-drug interactions, the outcome of
which ranges from negligible to life-threatening situations (Gouws et al., 2020). The experience of the use
of herbal medicines and preparations and the risks of interactions between
herbal and conventional medicines was investigated, and a total of 38.3% found
the use of herbal remedies safe and harmless, while 57.3% of respondents
regarded the combination of herbal and regular drugs as unsafe (Sile et al., 2023). This again buttressed the
fact that the finding that a blend of Z.
officinale, A. sativum, and
doxorubicin was safe at the administered doses of 318, 212, and 5 mg/kg body
weight, respectively, was exciting and promising.
Antioxidant
activity
In the antioxidant
assay, group 1 rats, which were treated with 5 ml/kg body weight of distilled
water and served as the overall control group, had a serum superoxide dismutase
(SOD) concentration of 3.520 ± 0.15 ng/ml, which indicated the natural level of
SOD in the rats. In group 2, bacterial lipopolysaccharide was used to induce
oxidative stress, which led to the rats having reduced serum concentration of
SOD (1.552 ± 0.14 ng/ml). SOD is an antioxidant enzyme, and its decrease in the
body results in oxidative stress. SOD is a crucial enzyme that helps neutralize
harmful superoxide radicals, which are a type of reactive oxygen species (ROS).
When SOD levels are reduced, these ROS can accumulate, causing damage to cells
and tissues, a state known as oxidative stress (Chen et al., 2023).
Group 3 rats were treated with a blend of Z. officinale and A. sativum
in a proportion of 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg body weight). This proportion was
confirmed in a preceding research to have the best antioxidant effects when
oxidative stress was induced in rats with 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene
(Oraekei et al., 2024). Expectedly, this combination ameliorated the
decrease in SOD caused by LPS and raised the SOD level to 2.944 ± 0.11 mg/ml,
which was significant when compared with group 2, which had an SOD level of
1.552 ± 0.14 mg/ml (p=1.99 x 10-11). When doxorubicin was added to the blend in
group 4, there was yet an increment in SOD level, which was significant when
compared with group 2. In group 5, doxorubicin alone had a reduction of SOD
(1.298 ± 0.03 mg/ml) that was even worse than the reduction caused by LPS. This
showed the extent to which the blend of Z. officinale and A. sativum in
a proportion of 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg body weight was able to remedy the oxidative
stress caused by doxorubicin when group 4 raised the SOD level to 2.090 ± 0.16
mg/ml (p = 8.25 x 10-12).
Anti-inflammatory
activity
In the test for
inflammatory activities of this blend of Z. officinale and A. sativum in
a proportion of 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg body weight with doxorubicin, similar trend
was observed in which LPS increased the inflammatory marker, nuclear factor
kappa β (NF-kβ) from 2.464 ± 0.11 mg/ml to 8.128 ± 0.20 mg/ml which was
significant (p = 6.00 x 10-9). Doxorubicin in group 5 increased NF-kβ even more
(9.364 ± 0.19 mg/ml) than the increment in group 2. Elevated levels of nuclear
factor kappa B (NF-kβ) in the nucleus of a cell are indeed a strong indicator
of inflammation. NF-kβ is a protein complex that acts as a transcription
factor, meaning it controls which genes are turned on or off in a cell. When
the body experiences inflammation, NF-kβ is activated and moves into the cell's
nucleus, where it triggers the expression of genes that promote inflammation.
In addition to being a possible transcription factor, it plays a very
significant role in the establishment of inflammation-associated immunological
responses in host cells (Mukherjee et al., 2024). Again, both the blend
of Z. officinale and A. sativum in a proportion of 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg
body weight in group 3 and such a blend with doxorubicin in group 4 reduced
NF-kβ level when compared with LPS group 2, as well as doxorubicin only group
5.
Conclusion
The blend of Z.
officinale and A. sativum in a proportion of 6:4 (318:212 mg/kg body
weight) was confirmed to possess the potential to reduce the oxidative stress
and inflammation caused by doxorubicin. As such, this blend of Z. officinale
and A. sativum in a proportion of 6:4 (318:21 2 mg/kg body weight) can be
used to counter the adverse effects of orthodox drugs that cause their toxicity
via an increase in reactive oxygen species and activation of inflammatory
mediators.
Acknowledgement
I am thankful to God
for his unwavering support throughout this study. My appreciation also goes to
the head, staff, and laboratory technologists of the Pharmacology and
Toxicology department for providing the necessary facilities that enabled the
smooth completion of this study
Disclosure
of conflict of interest
Oraekei Daniel
Ikechukwu declared no conflict of interest
Okonkwo Chukwuemeka
Micheal declared no conflict of interest
Mba Ogbonnaya declared
no conflict of interest
Abone Harrison Odera
declared no conflict of interest
Obidiegwu Onyeka
Chinwuba declared no conflict of interest
Chukwuka Benjamin Uzodinma declared
no conflict of interest
Statement
of ethical approval
Maintenance and care of
all animals were carried out in accordance with EU Directive 2010/63/EU for
animal experiments. Guide for the care and use of Laboratory Animals, DHHS
Publ. # (NIH 86-123) were strictly adhered to. Animal protocol was approved by the
Animal Care and Ethics Committee of Enugu State University of Science and
Technology with approval number ESUT/2025/AEC/0962/AP 845. There was additional
approval by the Nnamdi Azikiwe University’s Ethical Committee for the use of
Laboratory Animals for Research Purposes (Approval number is
NAU/AREC/2025/0077).
References
· Alexander
SK, Chrisanty C, Lumbwe K, Ian B, Patience C, Majorie M. (2016). Vitamin C
Levels in Lemons (Citrus Limon) Grown in Zambia; an Opportunity for Utilisation
in Fish Feeds. Journal of Agriculture and Life Sciences; Vol. 3, No. 1.
Accessed July, 2025.
· Al-Masri, M., Darwish, R., Safi, Y.,
Mustafa, A., Alzyoud, D., Almasri, M., Kahhaleh, B., & Khader, M. (2025).
Herbal and alternative medicine use: a cross sectional study to evaluate the
prevalence and predictors of use in cancer patients. Frontiers in
pharmacology, 16, 1535795.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2025.1535795.
· Amaeze
O. U.*, olugbakeef O. A., lawal M. (2020). Knowledge of Herbal Medicines and
Herb-drug Interaction Among Medical and Pharmacy Students of the University of
Lagos, Nigeria. Nig. J. Pharm. Res, 16 (1) pp 61-70.
https://doi.org/10.4314/njpr.v16i1.7.
· Ameade, E. P. K., Ibrahim, M.,
Ibrahim, H. S., Habib, R. H., & Gbedema, S. Y. (2018). Concurrent Use of
Herbal and Orthodox Medicines among Residents of Tamale, Northern Ghana, Who
Patronize Hospitals and Herbal Clinics. Evidence-based complementary and
alternative medicine: eCAM, 2018,
1289125. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1289125.
· Antonio
DM, Giuseppe DRS, Aurora C, Maria AR, Claudio D. (2021). Morphological
characteristics, ascorbic acid, and antioxidant activity during fruit ripening
of four lemons (Citrus limon (L.) Burm. F.) cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae;
Volume 276, 109741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109741.
· Babos,
M. B., Heinan, M., Redmond, L., Moiz, F., Souza-Peres, J. V., Samuels, V.,
Masimukku, T., Hamilton, D., Khalid, M., & Herscu, P. (2021). Herb–Drug
Interactions: Worlds Intersect with the Patient at the Center.Medicines,8(8),
44. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines8080044.
· Balkrishna
A, Sharma N, Srivastava D, Kukreti A, Srivastava S, Arya V. (2024). Exploring
the Safety, Efficacy, and Bioactivity of Herbal Medicines: Bridging Traditional
Wisdom and Modern Science in Healthcare. Future Integrative Medicine.
3(1):35-49. doi: 10.14218/FIM.2023.00086.
· Banerjee,
S., Chanda, A., Adhikari, A., Das, A., & Biswas, S. (2014). Evaluation of
Phytochemical Screening and Anti-Inflammatory Activity of Leaves and Stem of
Mikania scandens (L.) Wild.Annals of medical and health sciences research,4(4),
532–536. https://doi.org/10.4103/2141-9248.139302.
· Bazrafshani,
M.S., Pardakhty, A., Kalantari, K B, Haleh T, Sadra G P, SaraH,
ShivaA,
SoheilM,
AminB,
A., & HamidS.
(2023). The prevalence and predictors of herb-drug interactions among Iranian
cancer patients during chemotherapy courses.BMC Complement Med Ther23,
41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03869-1.
· Borse,
S. P., Singh, D. P., & Nivsarkar, M. (2019). Understanding the relevance of
herb-drug interaction studies with special focus on interplays: a prerequisite
for integrative medicine. Porto biomedical journal, 4(2), e15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbj.0000000000000015.
· Bukowska,
B., Grzegorowska, A., Szczerkowska-Majchrzak, E., Bukowski, K., Kadac-Czapska,
K., Grembecka, M., & Broncel, M. (2025). Hazardous Interactions Between
Food, Herbs, and Drugs in the First Stage of Biotransformation: Case Reports of
Adverse Drug Interactions in Humans. International Journal of Molecular
Sciences, 26(11),
5188. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26115188.
· Chaachouay,
N., & Zidane, L. (2024). Plant-Derived Natural Products: A Source for Drug
Discovery and Development.Drugs and Drug Candidates.3(1), 184-207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ddc3010011.
· Chaughule,
R.S., Barve, R.S. (2023). Role of herbal medicines in the treatment of
infectious diseases. Vegetos 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-022-00549-2.
Accessed July, 2025.
· Chen,
L., Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, W., Han, H., Yang, C., & Dong, X.
(2023). Superoxide dismutase ameliorates oxidative stress and regulates liver
transcriptomics to provide therapeutic benefits in hepatic inflammation. Peer
J, 11, e15829. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.15829.
· Coopoosamy, R., Singh, K.,
Naidoo, K. & Nadasan, D.S. (2023). ‘The role of phytomedicine: Bridging the
gap between the past, present, and future’, Journal of Medicinal Plants for
Economic Development 7(1), a197. https://doi.org/10.4102/jomped.v7i1.197.
· Cotoraci
C, Ciceu A, Sasu A, Hermenean A. (2021). Natural Antioxidants in Anemia
Treatment.International Journal of Molecular Sciences; 22(4):1883. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041883.
· Czigle,
S., Nagy, M., Mladěnka, P., Tóth, J., & OEMONOM. (2023). Pharmacokinetic
and pharmacodynamic herb-drug interactions-part I. Herbal medicines of the
central nervous system. PeerJ, 11,
e16149. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.16149.
· El-Saber
Batiha, G., Magdy Beshbishy, A., G Wasef, L., Elewa, Y. H. A., A Al-Sagan, A.,
Abd El-Hack, M. E., Taha, A. E., M Abd-Elhakim, Y., & Prasad Devkota, H.
(2020). Chemical Constituents and Pharmacological Activities of Garlic (Allium
sativum L.): A Review.Nutrients,12(3), 872. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12030872.
· Emanuel
L. P, Susan F. R, Kijakazi O. M, Hamisi M. M. (2014). Ethno-medicinal knowledge
and plants traditionally used to treat anemia in Tanzania: A cross-sectional
survey. Journal of Ethnopharmacology; Volume 154, Issue 3, Pages 767-773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2014.05.002.
· Fugh-Berman A. (2000). Herb-drug
interactions. Lancet (London, England), 355(9198), 134–138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06457-0.
· Emire
A S. and Sudip K R. (2005). Proximate composition and physico-chemical
properties of improved dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties grown in
Ethiopia. LWT - Food Science and Technology; Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages 331-338,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2004.07.002.
· Fu, B., Wang, N., Tan, H. Y., Li,
S., Cheung, F., & Feng, Y. (2018). Multi-Component Herbal Products in the
Prevention and Treatment of Chemotherapy-Associated Toxicity and Side Effects:
A Review on Experimental and Clinical Evidences. Frontiers in pharmacology,
9, 1394.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.01394.
· Gamil,
N.M, Elsayed, H.A, Hamed, R.M, Salah E.T, Ahmed
A.M, Mostafa
H.A, El-Shiekh R.A, & Abou-Hussein (2025).
Insights from herb interactions studies: a foundational report for
integrative medicine. Futur J Pharm Sci 11, 46.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43094-025-00794-7.
· Gouws,
C., & Hamman, J. H. (2020). What are the dangers of drug interactions with
herbal medicines? Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology,16(3),
165–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2020.1733969.
· Hardeep
SG. (2023). Recent development of novel drug delivery of herbal drugs, RPS
Pharmacy and Pharmacology Reports, Volume 2, Issue 4, October 2023,
rqad028,https://doi.org/10.1093/rpsppr/rqad028.
Accessed: April 28, 2025.
· Ihekwereme
PC, Oraekei DI*, Asomugha RN, Abone HO, Ezugwu MI and Nnamani ME. (2024).
Anti-breast cancer activities of Zingiber officinale and Allium
sativum ethanol extracts in 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene induced female
Wister rats. GSCBPS. 29(01), 224–232 DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2024.29.1.0304.
· Jin,
S., Lu, D., Ye, S., Ye, H., Zhu, L., Feng, Z., Liu, S., Wang, D., & Hu, Q.
(2005). A simplified probe preparation for ELISA-based NF-kappaB activity
assay.Journal of biochemical and biophysical methods,65(1),
20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbbm.2005.08.006.
· Jordan
L. (2024). Phytochemical Analysis and Pharmacological Activities of Traditional
Medicinal Plants. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 16:198. DOI:10.37532/0975-7384.2024.16(9).198.
· Kumar, A., P, N., Kumar, M., Jose,
A., Tomer, V., Oz, E., Proestos, C., Zeng, M., Elobeid, T., K, S., & Oz, F.
(2023). Major Phytochemicals: Recent Advances in Health Benefits and Extraction
Method. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 28(2), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28020887.
· Li,
C., Jia, Ww, Yang, Jl. et al., (2022).
Multi-compound and drug-combination pharmacokinetic research on Chinese
herbal medicines.Acta Pharmacol Sin 43, 3080–3095 (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41401-022-00983-7.
· Lorke D
(1983). A new approach to practical acute toxicity testing.Arch Toxicol.
54(4):275-87.
· Mukherjee
S, Dutta S, Pati S, Sarkar T, Paul S, Chakraborty S, Basak U, Dhar S, Das T, Sa
G. (2024). Nuclear Factor Kappa-B: The El Dorado of inflammatory immune
response. J Cell Mol Immunol. 2024; 3(1):6-19. Accessed July, 2025.
· Msomi
Z.N and Simelane M.B.C. (2019). Herbal Medicine [Internet]. Herbal Medicine.
IntechOpen; 2019. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72816.
· Odoh,
U. E., Obi, P. E., Ezea, C. C., Anwuchaepe, A. U. (2019a). Phytochemical
methods in plant analysis. 1st Ed. Pascal Communications, Nsukka, Enugu,
Nigeria. 47 p.
· Okem,
A., Henstra, C., Lambert, M., & Hayeshi, R. (2023). A review of the
pharmacodynamic effect of chemo-herbal drug combinations therapy for cancer
treatment.Medicine in Drug Discovery,17, Article
100147.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medidd.2022.100147. Accessed: April 28, 2025.
· Oluyomi
S A and Bukola T O (2014). "Lipid Profile and Oxidative Stress Markers in
Wistar Rats following Oral and Repeated Exposure to Fijk Herbal Mixture",
Journal of Toxicology, vol. 2014, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/876035.
· Oraekei
D I, *. Peter C I, Asomugha R N, Abone H O, Ezugwu M I, and Adione N M. (2024).
Potentials of Zingiber officinale and Allium sativum ethanol extracts to
inhibit oxidative stress and inflammation resulting from cancer induction with
7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health
Sciences, 2024, 19(02), 340–350 Article DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30574/wjbphs.2024.19.2.0540.
· Pan,
H. Y., Wu, L. W., Wang, P. C., Chiu, P. H., & Wang, M. T. (2022).
Real-world Evidence of the Herb-drug Interactions.Journal of food and drug
analysis,30(3), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.38212/2224-6614.3428.
· Petrovska B. B. (2012). Historical
review of medicinal plants' usage. Pharmacognosy reviews, 6(11), 1–5.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.95849.
· Rabizadeh,
F., Mirian, M. S., Doosti, R., Kiani-Anbouhi, R., & Eftekhari, E. (2022).
Phytochemical Classification of Medicinal Plants Used in the Treatment of
Kidney Disease Based on Traditional Persian Medicine. Evidence-based
complementary and alternative medicine: eCAM,2022, 8022599.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8022599.
· Ranasinghe,
P., Ranasinghe, P., Abeysekera, W. P., Premakumara, G. A., Perera, Y. S.,
Gurugama, P., & Gunatilake, S. B. (2012). In vitro erythrocyte membrane
stabilization properties of Carica papaya L. leaf extracts.Pharmacognosy
research, 4(4), 196–202.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-8490.102261.
· Sammán,
N., Maldonado, S., Alfaro, M. E., Farfán, N., & Gutierrez, J. (1999). Composition
of different bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris) of Northwestern Argentina
(Region NOA): cultivation zone influence.Journal of agricultural and food
chemistry; 47(7), 2685–2689. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf970967v.
· Sile,
I., Teterovska, R., Onzevs, O., & Ardava, E. (2023). Safety Concerns
Related to the Simultaneous Use of Prescription or Over-the-Counter Medications
and Herbal Medicinal Products: Survey Results among Latvian Citizens.International
Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,20(16), 6551.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20166551.
· Tesfaye
A. (2021). Revealing the Therapeutic Uses of Garlic (Allium sativum) and
Its Potential for Drug Discovery.The Scientific World Journal,2021,
8817288. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8817288. Accessed: April 28, 2025.
· Unuofin
J O*Nelisiwe
P M, Oluwatomiwa K P, Sogolo L L. (2021). Ginger from Farmyard to Town:
Nutritional and Pharmacological Applications. Front. Pharmacol., Sec.
Ethnopharmacology. Volume 12 – 2021.https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.779352.
Accessed: April 28, 2025.
· Wang, H., Khor, T. O., Shu, L., Su,
Z. Y., Fuentes, F., Lee, J. H., & Kong, A. N. (2012). Plants vs. cancer: a
review on natural phytochemicals in preventing and treating cancers and their
druggability. Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry, 12(10), 1281–1305.
https://doi.org/10.2174/187152012803833026.
· Yuan, H., Ma, Q., Ye, L., &
Piao, G. (2016). The Traditional Medicine and Modern Medicine from Natural
Products. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 21(5), 559. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050559.
· Zhou
X, Seto SW, Chang D, Kiat H, Razmovski-Naumovski V, Chan K and Bensoussan A
(2016) Synergistic Effects of Chinese Herbal Medicine: A Comprehensive Review
of Methodology and Current Research. Front. Pharmacol. 7:201. doi:
10.3389/fphar.2016.00201.